CSP Hash Incorrect Despite Correct Script and Hash (CSP Lab Issue?)
Hello all! I'm working on Introduction to Content Security Policy (CSP) Lab: Content Security Policy: Hashes exercise that requires generating the correct hash for an inline script like: <script>document.body.style.backgroundColor = "#ADDADE";</script> I’ve used both CyberChef and the SHA-256 JavaScript snippet to generate hashes like: sha256-+BWzTX+GJrse8ifajvHg6QFPdmE+JjXYmrYBn+kLITo= sha256-Msn/9dD1zBN7LGZyQyglKL9JMVyCsVqvZ7MAkmm/BpU= I've accounted for trailing newlines and whitespaces (CRLF, LF), used View Source (not dev tools), and verified that I'm hashing the exact script content. However, the lab continues to mark the answer as “incorrect.” Is this likely a glitch in the lab setup, or is there a common mistake I might be overlooking? Would appreciate any help or confirmation from someone who’s completed this lab or run into a similar problem
NHS Offensive Cyber Range: Armsdon Hospital
Hi all, Just wanted some advice on this as I am stuck. I managed to get into the intranet using SQL injection/union and extract all the usernames and passwords. I am not sure if I am on the wrong path or doing things in the wrong order for the next part. The FTP server seems to only be active on RDP. The DC has no samba vulnerabilities. So... I assume I try to use the credentials from the intranet to RDP to the DC/FTP (then after this elevate access using other techniques) but so far that has failed for the Armsdon users I have tried their users/passwords (from the intranet). Any tips welcome!
Trick or Treat on Specter Street: Widow's Web
I am very stucked in Trick or Treat on Specter Street: Widow's Web I can't do none of the questions, but in any case I start by 4th that is the first answerable one Your first task is to simulate the loyal Crawlers. Run legitimate-crawler and inspect the output in Lab-Files to observe their behavior. To simulate the rogue Crawlers, you must discover the hidden paths on the website. Read the blog posts – they contain clues. Disallow these in Website-Files/robots.txt and run malicious-crawler. Inspect the output in Lab-Files. What is the token? I have created the robots.txt file since I understand that malicious-crawler goes expressedly there. My robots.txt contains all url's I can imagin Disallow: /secret Disallow: /treat Disallow: /hidden Disallow: /crypt Disallow: /warden Disallow: /rituals Disallow: /witch-secrets Disallow: /admin Disallow: /vault Disallow: /uncover Disallow: /post1 Disallow: /post2 Disallow: /post3 Disallow: /post4 Disallow: /contact Disallow: /drafts/rituals But the result of malicious-crawler.txt doesn't give me either a token nor a hint I have curl-ed all pages looking for words as token and nothing. I have found some key words in http://127.0.0.1:3000/witch-secrets as intercepted-incantations, decoded them and nothing. I have searched in spider-sigthings.log what hapened at 3.00 am but nothing Can someone gime me a hint?
IoT & Embedded Devices: Certificate Underpinning
I am also stuck on Step 5 and having trouble with the trigger. I have self-signed certs, an HTTP server listening on 443 (bound to 0.0.0.0) as well as a sniffer for anything coming from the target. I have tried to trigger the target to connect using: for i in {1..5}; do echo '{"Update":"1","ClientId":"AXG1337VFXL","Server Ip":"<KALI_IP>"}' | nc -u <TARGET_IP> 8080; sleep 2; done Can anyone point me in the right direction?
CVE-2022-26134 (Confluence) – OGNL Injection
For Question 6. Look at the first exploit attempt by this attacker. What command did they run? I am wondering about why when sharing the commands found in the logs, it still outputs wrong. even if typing in "X-Cmd-Response" as the command as well as the entire string found. Wondering if they are exepecting a different format/snippet of the code, or the GET requests instead?
