Kerberos: Active Directory Certificate Services lab - getting KRB-ERROR (16): KDC_ERR_PADATA_TYPE_NOSUPP
Lab: Kerberos: Active Directory Certificate Services - Labs - Immersive I am not able to get tgt ticket using this command .\Rubeus.exe asktgt /certificate:cert.pfx /user:Administrator /ptt It throws error: KRB-ERROR (16) : KDC_ERR_PADATA_TYPE_NOSUPP I have tried all the steps in same order: 1. .\Certify.exe find /vulnerable 2. .\Certify.exe request /ca:DC01.krbtown.local\krbtown-DC01-CA /template:VulnTemplate /altname:Administrator 3. generate cert.pfx and running rubeus. Searched for this error and it says - "In order to login using a certificate through a valid Kerberos TGT, Public Key Cryptography for Initial Authentication (PKINIT) must be supported in AD." Can someone plz help me to solve the lab.
Apache Header Tampering
Can someone point me to the right track? On this one, I found the hidden directory, used an X-Forwarded-For: to see into that directory where scanning for files showed a lot of 404s, with just a few 403 response codes. I've tried everything I can think of with variations on X-Original-URL:, X-Rewrite-URL:, and X-Forwarded-Uri:, but none of them get me able to see into any of the files/directories. I've even tried a few variations instead of X-Forwarded-For:, such as X-Client-IP: and a few others. I feel like I must be missing something. I didn't find any actual .php files in the hidden directory but the question seems to indicate that there are some in there. I found what I think are other directories within that first hidden directory.Powershell Deobsfuscation Ep.7
I was working on this and got stuck with Ep.7. Appreciate if anyone can assist with this Powershell de-obfuscation. Step 1: I removed the splits accordingly and converted from hexadecimal Step 2: Next, there was another set of splits to perform and ascii conversion. Ended up with the small snip of string at the bottom with a lot of (spaces and tabs) at the beginning. Basically empty spaces before coming to this short scripts. I am not sure on how to move from here. Anyone can assist with this pls?
Radare2 Reverse Engineering: Ep.2 – Windows Binary Part 2; Final Question
I have managed to find the answer to Questions 1-4 of this lab, however I can't seem to identify the answer to the final question (Question 5 - What is the token?). I have run the binary and I get the “You have not met the requirements” message. I understand that there is an some type of execution error within the binary that I must correct for it to work properly however I have not been able to locate the error in order to analyze it and attempt to correct it. Any insight or guidance on what I'm missing / doing incorrectly would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. I am not getting a prompt to provide the password. I am not seeing the prompt to use the calculator to find the answer to the calculation that is presented. I can see that there is a reference to a token.txt file but I can’t seem to get access to the file to determine what the token value is.
NHS Offensive Cyber Range: Armsdon Hospital
Hi all, Just wanted some advice on this as I am stuck. I managed to get into the intranet using SQL injection/union and extract all the usernames and passwords. I am not sure if I am on the wrong path or doing things in the wrong order for the next part. The FTP server seems to only be active on RDP. The DC has no samba vulnerabilities. So... I assume I try to use the credentials from the intranet to RDP to the DC/FTP (then after this elevate access using other techniques) but so far that has failed for the Armsdon users I have tried their users/passwords (from the intranet). Any tips welcome!
CVE-2022-26134 (Confluence) – OGNL Injection
For Question 6. Look at the first exploit attempt by this attacker. What command did they run? I am wondering about why when sharing the commands found in the logs, it still outputs wrong. even if typing in "X-Cmd-Response" as the command as well as the entire string found. Wondering if they are exepecting a different format/snippet of the code, or the GET requests instead?
