CVE-2025-53770 - Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via unsafe deserialization in Microsoft SharePoint Server
Understanding the RCE On July 22, 2025, Immersive’s threat research team was trying to understand how the SharePoint zero-day vulnerability was uncovered, based on Eye Security’s initial article. There were many proofs of concept (PoCs) and initial articles on indicators of attack (IoAs) and their severity. But none covered the exploit itself or could help us understand how the exploit was weaponized in depth. In this blog, I’ll share our research process and how we (eventually!) got to the bottom of this exploit. The challenges of building a CTI lab Our initial thought process for building this Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) lab was fairly straightforward. We’d understand the indicators of compromise (IoCs) and the PoCs that were shared in the article, try replicating it with the PoC, and obtain some logs. However, it was easier said than done. What went wrong? The PoCs just didn't work, and there was no way for us to understand why. This makes sense retrospectively – initial articles only provided surface-level information, rather than details on how the exploit was made. We ended up deploying different variants of SharePoint to see which were vulnerable. Alas, nothing worked (I’ll explain why this happened in more depth later on). Looking at the logs to identify the problem didn’t work either, because who looks at logs, right? Some of the initial PoCs were taken down, and the ones remaining were missing a piece of the puzzle. It was also fairly noticeable that many of the PoCs added to GitHub weren’t true either, and some were ransomware binaries! Dissecting the payload – mistakes and a learning curve Based on the initial brief from the Eye Security article, we figured out that it was a deserialization problem. After many days of unravelling and building multiple SharePoint servers with different versions, the “Hallelujah” moment finally arrived. A new remote code execution (RCE) module for this exploit was committed to Metasploit's GitHub repo. It wasn't the code that mattered much to us, but the comments in it that got us interested: The highlighted comments helped us map out which deserialization gadget chain works against specific SharePoint Server versions. This was important, as the exploit itself abuses insecure deserialization in the ViewState on SharePoint pages like ToolPane.aspx. This is when it hit us: our initial exploit of the RCE using the TypeConfuseDelegate gadget with BinaryFormatter wasn't working because we weren’t targeting the versions that were vulnerable to that gadget chain. To put this to the test, we had the right version built (v16.0.10337.12109) and also decided to further analyze the payload itself from the Metasploit module – I know it's cutting corners, but I was very keen on how it all works together! To achieve this, we downloaded the earliest exploit module commit on its GitHub, added it to our existing Metasploit framework, and intercepted the request using BurpSuite. This gave us the PoC, which we could analyze: Obviously, there was no need to reinvent the wheel since Metasploit already had a functional module, but where’s the fun in that? Dissecting the payload – decoding It’s already noticeable that the payload is URL-encoded. By decoding it, you’ll be able to see the body of the request. It has references to controltemplates/ACLEditor and an Excel DataSet, which is commonly used in .NET deserialization exploits, along with a Base64 encoded and compressed data table: The next step was to extract and Base64 decode the compressed data table: The decoded and decompressed information is the raw XML schema and DiffGram that the DataSetWrapper spits out. The part highlighted in the red box is the embedded first-stage gadget, Base64 encoded as an XSD string. Remember when I mentioned that our PoCs weren't working earlier? It’s because we didn't embed our Base64 encoded payload onto a raw XML schema and DiffGram. If you take the Base64 encoded XSD string and decode it, you’d get the payload. The payload I had on Metasploit was: And by decoding the string obtained from above, we can see it too: Weaponizing our PoC to emulate the IoCs With all the juicy information to hand, it was time to recreate this and see how threat actors in the wild did it. Bear in mind that the IoCs from the research article mentioned they weren’t obtaining any shells from the RCE, but stealthily leaking cryptographic secrets from SharePoint servers, which were chained to craft a fully valid and signed payload using ysoserial. The PoC implemented based on the work from the Metasploit module wraps our initial “inner” ysoserial payload inside an XML and DataSet gadget that SharePoint expects, then serializes, compresses, and Base64 encodes it. The payload that was built closely resembles what’s seen in the wild, which was dropping malicious content to a file named spinstall0.aspx that leaks cryptographic secrets. This Base64 payload was then embedded into an XML and DataSet gadget, using our PoC: All that remained was to send the payload. Here’s what we noticed upon sending the request via Burp: And while looking at the Process Explorer running on our SharePoint test environment: Similar to the IoCs, you’ll note that w3wp.exe spawns cmd.exe, and a PowerShell process is then spawned from the cmd.exe child process. If it’s succeeded, you should be able to navigate to https://X.X.X.X/_layouts/15/spinstall0.aspx to view and read the SharePoint’s MachineKey config file, including the ValidationKey: Finally, from our ELK logs: As you’ll notice, the log shows that the exploit’s PowerShell payload used set-content to write an ASPX backdoor into SharePoint’s _layouts directory (spinstall0.aspx). In summary Looking back at this exploit, it’s interesting from an offensive perspective to see how advanced persistent threat actors are finding creative ways to compromise organization infrastructures. In the meantime, I can only send prayers to the SOC analysts and Sysadmins fixing SharePoint, because let’s be honest – SharePoint is a cave nobody comes out alive from! For more information and finer details on how the exploit works, I'll leave this fantastic article here: Viettel Cyber Security: SharePoint ToolShell – One Request PreAuth RCE ChainUnderstanding CVE-2024-3094: A Major Software Security Issue in XZ Utils
What is CVE-2024-3094? Recently, a critical security problem, known as CVE-2024-3094, was found in the XZ Utils library. XZ Utils is a set of open-source command-line tools and libraries for lossless data compression on various Linux systems. If your systems are running Linux or Mac, your OS likely uses it in the background when unpacking archives, and even if you’re using Windows, most of your services will use XZ Utils. This code allowed for SSH backdoor access and remote code execution on affected systems, earning a maximum CVSS score of 10. The harmful code was hidden within the XZ Utils software by a ‘trusted’ developer, starting with version 5.6.0. This developer was actually a bad actor who gained the trust of the sole maintainer of the code over many years of social engineering with multiple fake identities created to convince the maintainer that they were trustworthy. To learn more, check out the emails on research.swtch.com . Which Linux systems are affected? The compromised versions of XZ have been found in certain versions of Debian, Kali Linux, OpenSUSE, Arch Linux, and Fedora: Debian: Unstable/Sid versions from 5.5.1alpha-0.1 to 5.1.1-1 Kali Linux: Systems updated between March 26-29, 2024 OpenSUSE: Rolling releases Tumbleweed and MicroOS between March 7-28, 2024 Arch Linux: Versions 2024.03.01, VM images from late February to late March 2024 Fedora: Rawhide and Fedora 40 Beta Source: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-3094 How could this security issue be used by bad actors? Attackers could exploit this vulnerability by taking advantage of the backdoor inserted into the XZ Utils library. With this vulnerability, they can: Exploit the backdoor: Using the backdoor, attackers could bypass SSH authentication, allowing them to gain access to the system without needing valid credentials. Elevate privileges: Once inside, attackers could attempt to gain higher-level access, enabling them to control more parts of the system. Establish persistence: Attackers might install persistent malware to maintain access to the compromised system. Spread laterally: From the initial compromised system, attackers could move laterally within the network, targeting other systems and spreading their control. Steal sensitive data: Attackers could access and exfiltrate sensitive data, such as personal information, financial records, or intellectual property. Disrupt operations: By tampering with critical services or data, attackers could disrupt business operations, leading to downtime and financial losses. Deploy ransomware: Attackers could encrypt critical data and demand a ransom for its decryption, causing further damage and financial loss. How to protect your systems To protect your systems from this vulnerability, you should verify if your systems are using the compromised versions of XZ Utils and keep up with the latest advice from vendors. If your systems contain the mentioned versions, make sure you update to at least version 5.6.1-2. You’ll also want to ensure proper security hygiene by keeping all other software up to date with the latest security patches. Finally, make sure your IT and security teams understand this vulnerability, are able to fix it, and know how to respond to potential threats. Conclusion CVE-2024-3094 highlights the importance of securing the software supply chain. By understanding this security issue and taking proactive steps, you can better protect your systems from sophisticated attacks. Keep your systems updated, improve your organizational resilience, and consult with your software vendors for the latest security information. Recommended content If you’d like to know more, we have an XZ Utils Lab in the latest CVEs collection. In the lab, you'll take on the role of a CIRT analyst researching backdoor deployment techniques. Share your thoughts If this vulnerability impacted your organization, what steps did you take to fix it, and what changes have you made to prevent future issues? Comment and collaborate with others in the comments!CVE-2024-30051: What You Need to Know
What is CVE-2024-30051? CVE-2024-30051 is a vulnerability in the Microsoft Windows Desktop Window Manager (DWM) Core Library that allows attackers to gain SYSTEM-level privileges and execute arbitrary code, giving them extensive control over the compromised system. Which systems are affected? CVE-2024-30051 impacts a broad range of Windows systems, including: Windows 10 (various versions) Windows 11 (various versions) Windows Server 2016 and later versions For a precise list of affected product configurations, check out the NIST National Vulnerability Database. How could bad actors use this security issue? Attackers have already exploited CVE-2024-30051 in real-world attacks, using it to distribute Qakbot malware via malicious email attachments or compromised websites. Once the malicious code is executed, the vulnerability is used to escalate privileges, allowing deep system access for installing more malware, stealing sensitive data, or taking full control of the system. How to protect your organisation The simplest and most obvious method is to apply the latest Windows security updates as soon as they become available. Microsoft released patches addressing CVE-2024-30051 as part of its May 2024 Patch Tuesday updates. Organisations and users are strongly advised to apply these patches immediately to protect their systems from potential exploitation. To verify if you've been affected by this vulnerability, analyse your logs for suspicious activity. Specifically, look for DLLs loaded from locations outside of system32 by legitimate Windows processes, as this may indicate the CVE-2024-30051 exploit has been used to load a malicious DLL. Additionally, to mitigate against future vulnerabilities, educate users about the risks of phishing and malware. Qakbot is often spread through email attachments or malicious websites. Educate users about the risks of opening attachments from unknown senders or clicking on suspicious links in emails. Conclusion CVE-2024-30051 highlights the importance of cybersecurity awareness and proactive measures as it can be mitigated with organisational cyber awareness and regular patching policies. As always, staying informed about potential vulnerabilities is crucial to mitigating such risks. Recommended content If you’d like to learn how to detect this vulnerability in a sandboxed environment, check out our CVE-2024-30051 lab. In this lab, you'll threat hunt through a SIEM system to identify indicators of compromise (IoCs). Don’t forget you can seek help and collaboration with this lab content in our Help & Support Forum! Share your thoughts If CVE-2024-30051 has impacted your organization, we’d love to hear about your steps to mitigate the risk. Do you have any recommendations for preparing for similar vulnerabilities in the future?Understanding CVE-2025-32463: How a Chroot Flag in Sudo Could Give You Root
The vulnerability stems from the way sudo handles its --chroot (or -R) option, allowing attackers to load arbitrary shared libraries as root if they can control the chroot environment. To be clear: this is local privilege escalation, not remote code execution. But don’t let that lull you into thinking it’s harmless. If a threat actor or malicious insider already has local access, exploiting this bug is alarmingly straightforward. Exploitation has already been demonstrated publicly and could easily be automated. Most major Linux distributions were affected prior to patching, including Ubuntu, Red Hat, Debian, and SUSE. This post breaks down how the vulnerability works, who it impacts, and what steps you should take to defend against it. What’s going on inside sudo? Let’s start with how the --chroot flag is supposed to work. Introduced in sudo 1.9.14, this option allows administrators to run commands within a different root directory – handy for sandboxing or container-like behavior. Here’s the problem: sudo switches the root before it finishes evaluating its security policy. That means if an attacker can write to the specified chroot directory, they can place fake versions of critical system files there, specifically /etc/nsswitch.conf and malicious shared libraries like libnss_files.so.2. During execution, sudo loads these files as root, which allows the attacker’s code to run with elevated privileges. From there, a root shell is just a few lines of shell script away. Who discovered it, and when was it fixed? Security researcher Rich Mirch reported the flaw and responsibly disclosed it to the sudo maintainers in April 2025. A fix was released in sudo 1.9.17p1 on June 30, 2025, with most major Linux distributions pushing patches shortly afterward. Interestingly, this bug has existed quietly in the wild since late 2013. It only came to light because someone finally noticed how the order of operations in sudo could be abused. What makes it so dangerous? Although it’s not exploitable remotely, a combination of factors makes this vulnerability especially serious: The attack is low complexity and requires no special privileges. The vulnerable --chroot flag is available by default. It provides immediate root access on successful exploitation. Proof-of-concept code is already available publicly. In practical terms, if a malicious actor gains access to a Linux box with a writable directory (like /tmp), they can elevate to root without needing to trick anyone or wait for anything. This is a genuine risk in cloud environments, shared systems, and developer machines. Proof of concept: A real-world exploit A working exploit script called sudo-chwoot has been published on GitHub. It uses Docker to demonstrate the full attack chain, from creating a fake root directory to writing malicious config and libraries to popping a root shell. This makes CVE-2025-32463 not just a theoretical risk, but a very real one. Expect script-kiddie adaptations soon if they’re not already circulating. How to fix or mitigate it If your systems run sudo 1.9.14 to 1.9.17, the first thing to do is upgrade immediately to 1.9.17p1 or apply your distro’s backported security patches. Beyond patching, here are key mitigation steps: Disable --chroot support if it’s not required. Audit your sudoers policy to ensure only trusted users have access to -R or custom runchroot commands. Use file system permissions and mount options (nosuid, noexec, etc.) to harden temp directories and restrict code execution. Monitor usage of sudo -R or --chroot in logs and command history – this isn’t a flag you typically see in everyday use. Who’s affected? Almost every major Linux distribution had some exposure to this flaw, especially if running recent versions of sudo. Known affected platforms include: Ubuntu 22.04, 23.10 Debian 12 Red Hat and CentOS 9+ SUSE Linux Enterprise Fedora Amazon Linux 2023 Alpine Oracle Linux Arch Gentoo macOS also uses sudo, but the default configuration and file system protections may limit exploitability there. What should security teams do now? Start by identifying where affected sudo versions are installed in your fleet. Patch aggressively – this isn’t a "wait and see" vulnerability. Then do the following: Scan audit logs for unusual use of sudo -R. Tighten permissions on writable directories and restrict shell access where possible. If you're using sudo in Docker containers, verify that chroot behavior is isolated properly and not exposed through bind mounts. SOC teams should also consider deploying detection rules (e.g., Sigma) to raise alerts on unexpected invocations of sudo with -R, particularly in development, CI/CD, and jump box environments. In summary CVE-2025-32463 is a perfect example of how complex tools like sudo – even ones we trust implicitly – can become dangerous through subtle misbehaviors. It also reminds us that privilege escalation vulnerabilities don’t have to be flashy to be effective. This isn’t a vulnerability you can afford to ignore. If you’re responsible for Linux infrastructure, it’s time to patch and lock things down. Privilege escalation is often the missing link in post-compromise attack paths. Don’t let sudo be that link in your environment. Recommended content Immersive's Container 7 Research Team recently released a lab dedicated to CVE-2025-32463. This lab includes a vulnerable version of sudo for users to exploit, providing hands-on experience and an in-depth understanding. In the lab, you’ll exploit the vulnerability and use it to elevate privileges and capture a token. Read more about it here.Urgent Security Alert: Critical Flaw in CrushFTP Puts Your Data at Risk (CVE-2025-31161)
What is CVE-2025-31161? CrushFTP is widely used by businesses to transfer files securely. CVE-2025-31161 is a critical flaw that impacts CrushFTP versions 10 (up to 10.8.3) and 11 (up to 11.3.0). The flaw is a type of authentication bypass, meaning attackers can skip the login process altogether. It’s easy for attackers to exploit remotely, requires no special access or user interaction, and can lead to the complete loss of data privacy, integrity, and system availability. It has a severity rating of 9.8 (“Critical”) in the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS). Initial confusion caused this vulnerability to be briefly identified as CVE-2025-2825, but the official and correct designation is CVE-2025-31161. How does this attack work? The problem lies in how CrushFTP handles certain security checks for incoming web requests. Essentially, there’s a small window during the login process where an attacker can trick the system. Here’s a quick explanation of how it works. A flaw in the security check CrushFTP has a specific part of its code that checks for secure login information. However, there’s a subtle error where an internal setting is accidentally set to “true” by default. Bypassing the password If the username in the attacker’s fake login information doesn’t contain a specific character (the tilde ‘~’), this “true” setting tells the system to skip the password check entirely. This means an attacker can log in as a legitimate user without knowing their password. Crafting a malicious request Attackers send a custom web request to the CrushFTP server, which includes fake security information and a specific cookie. By combining these elements, the attacker can trigger the vulnerability and gain unauthorized administrative access. Is your software vulnerable? Your CrushFTP version Is it vulnerable? Action required 10.0.0 through 10.8.3 YES Update immediately 11.0.0 through 11.3.0 YES Update immediately 10.8.4 or higher NO (it’s patched!) Verify your version 11.3.1 or higher NO (it’s patched!) Verify your version Evidence of active exploitation Active exploitation was reported shortly after the patches were released, with security firms observing widespread attacks as early as March 30-31, 2025. Initially, over 1,500 vulnerable CrushFTP instances were exposed online, with significant numbers in the United States. In the following weeks, hundreds of organizations remained unpatched. Upon successful entry, attackers often establish persistent access. This is done by creating new administrator accounts or deploying Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) tools, such as MeshAgent or MeshCentral, and AnyDesk. Attackers also deploy Telegram bot binaries to steal system information and sensitive data. The “Kill Security” (or “Kill”) ransomware group has publicly claimed responsibility for some early exploitation efforts, announcing that they’ve obtained “significant volumes of sensitive data” and intend to extort victims. It highlights a trend where Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are increasingly targeted by ransomware and data extortion groups for their high-value data. The impact of a successful attack A successful exploit grants attackers unauthenticated administrative access, which has severe consequences: Full system compromise: Attackers can gain complete control over the CrushFTP application and the server it runs on. Data exfiltration: They can access and steal any sensitive data stored on the platform or accessible through it. Data integrity and ransomware: Attackers can modify, delete, or encrypt files, potentially deploying ransomware to disrupt operations and demand payments. Legal and regulatory implications: Organizations may face significant fines, reputational damage, and legal liabilities if personal data is compromised, with strict notification deadlines (e.g. 72 hours under GDPR). How to protect your organization The attack’s multi-layered approach combines technical exploitation with advanced social engineering to bypass security controls and user vigilance. It’s essential to take the following steps to protect your organization. Apply updates immediately UPDATE NOW: Immediately update all CrushFTP installations to version 10.8.4 or later or 11.3.1 or later. Only obtain updates from the official CrushFTP website. Deploy patches: CrushFTP doesn’t have automatic updates, so enterprises need to apply proactive, centralized patching. Verify updates: Ensure updates are successfully applied across your environment. Be proactive with security measures and hardening Enforce strong passwords: Mandate strong, unique passwords for all CrushFTP accounts, especially administrators. Monitor logs comprehensively: Actively monitor CrushFTP server logs (especially \logs\session_logs) for suspicious activity, like new accounts, unusual access, or RMM tool deployments. Layer your security: Employ strong email and web filtering, advanced endpoint detection and response (EDR), and network segmentation. Restrict network access: Limit CrushFTP access to only trusted clients and IP ranges. Assess and remediate compromise Applying the patch alone will not remove any existing access gained by attackers who exploited the vulnerability before the software update. Given active exploitation has been confirmed, you should assume potential prior compromise and take the following steps: Assess for unauthorized access: If you were running a vulnerable version, conduct a thorough assessment immediately for signs of compromise going back to at least March 30, 2025. Conduct forensic analysis: Examine server logs for new user accounts, modified user properties, or deployed RMM tools and malware. Remediate existing compromises: Remove unauthorized accounts, change all legitimate CrushFTP passwords, and remove any deployed malware. If necessary, restore systems from clean, verified backups. Address legal obligations: If a data breach is confirmed, promptly fulfill data protection (e.g. GDPR) and industry-specific regulatory obligations, including potential notifications. This vulnerability highlights the need to continuously monitor systems, stay informed about threats, and adopt a layered security approach to protect critical infrastructure. Conclusion The critical CrushFTP vulnerability puts a spotlight on the fast-paced world of cyber threats. In addition to patching and implementing security processes, it’s vital to run organizational exercises. Regularly practicing incident response through drills and simulations helps your team reinforce existing policies and processes. This preparation allows them to respond effectively when similar vulnerabilities emerge, reducing potential harm and protecting sensitive data. Share your thoughts Has your business been affected by the CVE-2025-31161 flaw or something similar? How do you stay up to date with the latest cyber threats and keep your team alert to risks? Let us know in the comments below.Understanding CVE-2023-49103: A Critical Vulnerability in ownCloud Graph API
ownCloud is a widely used open-source platform designed for file synchronization, sharing, and collaboration. It allows organizations to host their own cloud storage, ensuring data sovereignty and compliance with privacy regulations. Its flexibility and rich feature set have made it popular among enterprises and individual users alike. However, as with any software, vulnerabilities can emerge, and in late 2023, a critical security flaw – CVE-2023-49103 – was discovered in its Graph API application. This flaw could allow unauthorized access to sensitive configuration details, such as admin passwords, mail server credentials, and license keys. The risk is especially severe for organizations using ownCloud in containerized environments, where environment variables may be exposed. Let’s break down the vulnerability, its impact, and mitigation steps. Details of the vulnerability The vulnerability resides in the graphapi application of ownCloud. It leverages a third-party library file, GetPhpInfo.php, which calls the PHP phpinfo() function. This function, while commonly used for debugging, outputs detailed information about the server’s PHP configuration. In containerized deployments, environment variables – which often include sensitive information – are exposed, posing a severe security risk. Docker-based deployments of ownCloud are particularly susceptible, as Docker containers often rely on environment variables to pass sensitive information like database credentials and API keys during runtime. Attackers exploiting this vulnerability can use the phpinfo() output to capture these details, potentially compromising the entire containerized setup. Even disabling the graphapi app doesn’t fully mitigate the issue, as the vulnerable file remains accessible unless explicitly removed. Impact of CVE-2023-49103 When exploited, this vulnerability allows attackers to extract sensitive information without requiring authentication. The exposed data could include: ownCloud administrator passwords Mail server credentials Database credentials ownCloud license key Such information disclosures could lead to data breaches, unauthorized access to critical systems, and further exploitation of the organization’s infrastructure. Exploitation in the wild This vulnerability has been actively exploited, highlighting the urgency for remediation. The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has added CVE-2023-49103 to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) Catalog, emphasizing the need for immediate action by affected organizations. Steps to mitigate the vulnerability If your organization uses ownCloud, the following steps are advised to mitigate the risk posed by CVE-2023-49103: Update the Graph API application Upgrade to version 0.3.1 or later of the graphapi app. The updated version removes the vulnerable GetPhpInfo.php file, addressing the root cause of the issue. Remove the vulnerable file If upgrading isn’t immediately possible, manually delete the file located at: owncloud/apps/graphapi/vendor/microsoft/microsoft-graph/tests/GetPhpInfo.php Disable the phpinfo() function Modify your PHP configuration to disable the phpinfo() function. This precaution reduces the risk of similar vulnerabilities in the future. Change all exposed credentials Immediately rotate any credentials that may have been exposed, including: Admin passwords Mail server logins Database credentials API and storage keys Secure Docker environments For Docker-based deployments, use secret management tools like Docker Secrets or HashiCorp Vault to handle sensitive data instead of relying on environment variables. Limit access to containerized services and ensure proper network segmentation. Regularly scan Docker images for vulnerabilities and keep them updated. Keep your ownCloud server updated Ensure your ownCloud instance is running the latest server version, as updates often include critical security patches. Proactive security measures While addressing CVE-2023-49103 is essential, organizations should adopt broader security measures to prevent similar risks in the future: Conduct regular security audits Routine assessments can identify vulnerabilities before they are exploited. Implement environment variable best practices Minimize sensitive data stored in environment variables and use secret management tools. Utilize web application firewalls (WAFs) WAFs can help block unauthorized access attempts. Train teams on security protocols Ensure your IT teams are aware of emerging threats and understand mitigation strategies. Recommended content The Immersive Labs catalog includes a lab dedicated to CVE-2023-49103. This lab provides a vulnerable version of ownCloud hosted within a vulnerable Docker container. This lab offers an in-depth understanding of the vulnerability and its associated exploit through practical, hands-on experience. You’ll exploit the vulnerable instance to gain access to sensitive information, allowing you unauthorized access to the system as a privileged user. Conclusion CVE-2023-49103 underscores the importance of proactive security measures in software deployment. For organizations leveraging ownCloud, this vulnerability serves as a reminder to maintain vigilance, regularly update systems, and adopt comprehensive security practices. By promptly addressing the issue and implementing the recommended mitigations, organizations can safeguard their sensitive data and reduce the likelihood of compromise. Share your thoughts If this vulnerability impacted your organization, what steps did you take to fix it, and what changes have you made to prevent future issues?
